CMC Markets Carte de Panne
La carte des pannes suivante montre les emplacements les plus récents dans le monde où les utilisateurs de CMC Markets ont signalé leurs problèmes et leurs pannes. Si vous rencontrez un problème avec CMC Markets et que votre région n'est pas répertoriée, veuillez soumettre un rapport ci-dessous.
La carte thermique ci-dessus montre où les rapports les plus récents soumis par les utilisateurs et les médias sociaux sont regroupés géographiquement. La densité de ces rapports est représentée par l'échelle de couleurs comme indiqué ci-dessous.
Utilisateurs de CMC Markets concernés:
CMC Markets est une société basée au Royaume-Uni qui propose des opérations en ligne sur les actions, des paris sur les spreads, des contrats de différence (CFD) et des devises sur les marchés mondiaux. Le siège social de CMC est situé à Londres, avec des hubs à Sydney et à Singapour. Il est coté à la Bourse de Londres.
Emplacements les plus touchés
Les rapports d'interruption et les problèmes survenus au cours des 15 derniers jours provenaient de:
| Emplacement | Rapports |
|---|---|
| Sydney, NSW | 9 |
| Melbourne, VIC | 8 |
| Zürich, ZH | 1 |
| Brisbane, QLD | 1 |
Discussion communautaire
Conseils? Frustrations? Partagez-le ici. Les commentaires utiles comprennent une description du problème, la ville et le code postal.
Méfiez-vous des "numéros d'assistance" ou des comptes de "récupération" qui pourraient être affichés ci-dessous. Assurez-vous de signaler et de voter contre ces commentaires. Évitez de publier vos informations personnelles.
CMC Markets Rapports de Problèmes
Dernières pannes, problèmes et rapports de problèmes dans les médias sociaux:
-
Nomorebull (@Nomorebull13) a signalé@CMCMarkets will this affect your CEOs £22 million dividend whilst people who have entrusted you with money lose out because of your **** service?!
-
andrew_perth (@PerthAndrew) a signalé@CMCMarkets not working on chrome?
-
Bombaytonic (@bombaytonic717) a signaléThis is a strategic infrastructure milestone for @CMCMarkets & #StrikeX as it relates to laying an institutional grade foundation for settlement to support phase 2 tokenization and digital asset movement at scale. Super bullish for $STRX. This is exactly what you want to see… 👉 It means CMC is deploying blockchain settlement that can support institutional-grade asset movement. 👉 It strongly aligns with the kind of rails needed for Phase 2 but is not itself Phase 2. 👉 It positions CMC + StrikeX to be ready for real-world tokenization and frictionless settlement — not just speculative markets.
-
NUMBER 1 ASX TRADER (@deletedacc824) a signalé@HSydneyHC @CMCMarkets @CMCMarketsAusNZ Absolute dog platform in the last 3 weeks, loves to crash when the market is open.
-
Letsgooooo (@TradeStrikeX) a signaléNot going to talk down the others, but I will say that $STRX token #StrikeX has major institutional backing from @CMCMarkets who will soon start taking their billions of daily trading volume onto the blockchain Potential upside is basically limitless so DYOR and position yourselves accordingly
-
blue market guru (@techtrader33) a signaléUser data services down any updates? @CMCMarkets
-
Lee Frankel (@FrankelLee30910) a signalé@adilad73 @CastoreEngland @CMCMarkets Went down the comments like the yellow one for the away strip
-
Perize 🚀 (@LePerize) a signalé@CMCMarkets @CMCMarketsSG y’all have the worst customer support and operation team ever. I have filed a simple request with evidence provided because of your data issue problem but I have been met with constant procrastination and delayed in response. Horrible service and broker
-
Bombaytonic (@bombaytonic717) a signaléMany, have wondered why we are not seeing more $STRX #StrikeX token speculation from @CMCMarkets insiders especially at recent lows. Quite honestly, maybe it’s already happened, but the below gives an argument why these folks can’t be buying right now or at least difficult for them to do so. CMC has already executed tokenised equity issuance inside regulated custody frameworks (via CMC CapX) with StrikeX minting the mirror token on Arbitrum That is post-legal review activity — meaning: 👉 Compliance 👉 Market abuse teams 👉 Personal account dealing (PAD) surveillance 👉 Regulatory reporting …are already live on anything touching this stack. When a regulated broker-dealer is: •Acting as placement agent •Tokenising securities •And now controls the tokenisation engine …they cross from “crypto partner” into: Dealer-restricted person Under market integrity rules (UK MAR / CIRO equivalents), dealer-restricted persons: “Generally [are] prohibited [from] purchases… of restricted securities where there is undisclosed material information regarding the issuer.” Now here’s the translation into plain English: If CMC Markets has: •Non-public knowledge of •A commercial rollout •Of infrastructure •That they control •Built by StrikeX Then ANY employee trading STRX ahead of launch becomes: ✔ Market abuse risk ✔ Insider dealing exposure ✔ Front-running optics ✔ FCA enforcement risk ✔ Listing rule breach risk ⸻ 🧠 Which Means In Practice: Even if you cannot find STRX on a public restricted list (you never will): Internally, CMC almost certainly has: •PAD pre-clearance requirements •Blackout periods •MNPI attestations •Related-party trading bans •Watch lists (soft) •Restricted lists (hard) …and STRX would be a textbook inclusion candidate because: 📌 They now control product direction 📌 They are commercialising tokenised securities 📌 They are listed on the LSE 📌 They are operating under MAR That is literally the regulatory environment where firms freeze employee trading in partner securities pre-commercial release. In TradFi-native crypto integrations: Retail hype normally comes from: •VC funds •Employees •Devs •Service providers •Advisory firms But here: Anyone inside: •CMC CapX •Corporate broking •Capital markets •Compliance •Engineering •Legal •Product •StrikeX integration layer …is almost certainly PAD-monitored. Meaning: The normal speculative frontrunning mechanism may literally not exist in this case. We’re doing this slowly under regulatory supervision.” They are NOT marketing a crypto app. They are integrating settlement-layer infra into a regulated brokerage. So, that leads me to the reg side of the equation and why that may be part of the wait we are seeing. I’ll touch on that next later on…
-
Zack (@Zack00587426) a signalé@CMCMarkets can't login
-
Stirling Trader (@stirlingtrader) a signalé@CMCMarkets The mobile app is the web app is still down
-
EV harley_slamm (@harley_slamm) a signalé@mhewson_CMC @CMCMarkets The problem is every man and his dog is long DXY and short Cable and EURUSD! It just needs a single data point for a mother of all short-covering rallies...
-
Bombaytonic (@bombaytonic717) a signaléMany, have wondered why we are not seeing more token speculation from @CMCMarkets insiders especially at recent lows. Quite honestly, maybe it’s already happened, but the below gives an argument why these folks can’t be buying right now or at least difficult for them to do so. CMC has already executed tokenised equity issuance inside regulated custody frameworks (via CMC CapX) with StrikeX minting the mirror token on Arbitrum That is post-legal review activity — meaning: 👉 Compliance 👉 Market abuse teams 👉 Personal account dealing (PAD) surveillance 👉 Regulatory reporting …are already live on anything touching this stack. When a regulated broker-dealer is: •Acting as placement agent •Tokenising securities •And now controls the tokenisation engine …they cross from “crypto partner” into: Dealer-restricted person Under market integrity rules (UK MAR / CIRO equivalents), dealer-restricted persons: “Generally [are] prohibited [from] purchases… of restricted securities where there is undisclosed material information regarding the issuer.” Now here’s the translation into plain English: If CMC Markets has: •Non-public knowledge of •A commercial rollout •Of infrastructure •That they control •Built by StrikeX Then ANY employee trading STRX ahead of launch becomes: ✔ Market abuse risk ✔ Insider dealing exposure ✔ Front-running optics ✔ FCA enforcement risk ✔ Listing rule breach risk ⸻ 🧠 Which Means In Practice: Even if you cannot find STRX on a public restricted list (you never will): Internally, CMC almost certainly has: •PAD pre-clearance requirements •Blackout periods •MNPI attestations •Related-party trading bans •Watch lists (soft) •Restricted lists (hard) …and STRX would be a textbook inclusion candidate because: 📌 They now control product direction 📌 They are commercialising tokenised securities 📌 They are listed on the LSE 📌 They are operating under MAR That is literally the regulatory environment where firms freeze employee trading in partner securities pre-commercial release. In TradFi-native crypto integrations: Retail hype normally comes from: •VC funds •Employees •Devs •Service providers •Advisory firms But here: Anyone inside: •CMC CapX •Corporate broking •Capital markets •Compliance •Engineering •Legal •Product •StrikeX integration layer …is almost certainly PAD-monitored. Meaning: The normal speculative frontrunning mechanism may literally not exist in this case. We’re doing this slowly under regulatory supervision.” They are NOT marketing a crypto app. They are integrating settlement-layer infra into a regulated brokerage. So, that leads me to the reg side of the equation and why that may be part of the wait we are seeing. I’ll touch on that next later on… #StrikeX $STRX
-
Ronnie (@Ronniemarkets) a signaléIs #cmcx @CMCMarkets platform down? Or just mine 🤔
-
Panic di indonesia lagi 🇮🇩 (@lagi_indonesia) a signalé@proactive_UK @CMCMarkets Than why it goes down 19%